Avaliações do Wrike

Gosto de como é fácil gerenciar projetos do inicio ao fim e atribuir tarefas. Também permite revisões/aprovações que facilitam o andamento dos projetos.

Ás vezes, há muitas seleções, o que torna as coisas um pouco complexa para usuários sem experiencia em projetos. Lutamos com muitas tarefas/subtarefas dentro dos projetos, o que ás vezes cria um pouco de confusão.

Essa plataforma nos ajuda a identificar o que é importante priorizar e o que pode esperar. A visibilidade dos recursos é muito boa relatórios e os fluxos de trabalho em tempo real.

No meu ver, a plataforma é rica em funcionalidades e cumpre o que promete, não tenha nada á reclamar.

After spending a few years with Wrike and becoming proficient with its workflow creation features, I can confidently declare that its ability to construct interdependencies is its most useful function. Connecting our visual work within tasks has been a game-changer for developing throughlines for the creative team I work on. The changes to the user interface over the past year, as well as the connectivity with Slack, have been immensely helpful to my team. The alert system works well.

The Mac desktop application isn't perfect. As soon as Apple releases an update, it often becomes incompatible with the new software and stops working.

Once deployed and your Space is setup, Wrike makes the management of project easy, especially with Templates for recurring projects.

For someone without some degree of understanding of deployment and setup, Wrike would be difficult to implement. The ability to mass edit tasks is lacking.

Wrike is flexible and it allows you to add more team members when you have more projects or reduce them when there are fewer projects. It allows teams to interact, share ideas, tasks, and submit documents from any location with internet. Since we started using Wrike, we no longer have long email threads, too many chats, or frequent meetings. Anyone knows their task, the deadline, and what is required of them by simply login in to Wrike.

Wrike requires some learning to get on board. We had to involve an experienced user to know how to customize it to match our projects. The chat support is an AI tool that rarely grasps what you are talking about. It ends up frustrating you. The support representative takes long to respond and always provides very short responses. Apart from that, Wrike has what our team needed to remain productive and serve our clients better.

Detailed task management
Workload managment

See below including very poor customer service

Wrike has a simple and user-friendly design that display various features required for effective project management. The drag-and-drop function makes it stand out because it is easy to understand. Wrike allows a team of coworkers to access from anywhere, collaborate, share tasks, comments, files, and track time spent on a project. You can use it for different projects where individual efforts are needed to achieve a common goal. You don't have to be physically there to monitor a project or collaborate with others.

It can be hard to follow minor changes especially when you have fairly large team and a project with a tight deadline. Choosing the ideal workflow was challenging when we were starting out since most of the team members forgot about moving the cards. If your project has many stages/ phases, you cannot adjust the size of the content to see all the columns so you have to scroll across to see what is not visible on the screen.

Wrike is efficient and easy to use; most of all, it has a simple user interface that allows me to construct processes that don't interfere with the connections I make with other applications I use. We've created a handy task window that neatly summarizes everything you need to do. Since many tasks in Wrike may be automated without an administrator, our company has boosted the number of projects it completes each week. It's an all-in-one solution that streamlines your workday by giving you access to top-notch tools, data, and features.

It would be nice if training videos were available to help users learn how to utilize Wrike's features effectively.

Seamlessly prioritise and arrange projects and tasks with their order and need of urgency.
Project budgeting and business planning.
Significant due dates adding.
Ease of usability and implementation.

Since it has been of great impact especially on team and tasks management, I personally I congratulates its vendor.

I really love the project management user interface on Wrike. It's very intuitive, and it's very easy to prioritize and assign tasks that can more easily be prioritized among my consulting projects and colleagues' teams. I like the look of the time tracking and gantt chart views as well. The customizability is key as well.

I haven't yet learned about all the ways in which Wrike can be integrated into some of our current enterprise management software.

Wrike was primarily utilized as a project management and training module management system. It helped us categorize courses according to job functions and create specialized training plans.

There were hiccups in the updating process for assigned tasks on occasion. For classroom settings, the multi-user feature felt clumsy.

Since I've never used any other project management software before, I can't really make any comparisons. However, Wrike successfully manages several difficult projects, which is exactly what I needed.

It would be convenient if the left-hand Inbox could be hidden when working on projects. The capabilities for reporting are subpar. Wrike might learn from Smartsheet's reporting and improve upon its own system accordingly.

Besides the Kanban-style visualization, I like viewing the task list in a list or table. Tasks can be managed intuitively in the Kanban format, but sorting them by deadline or person in charge isn't easy. If it is a table display, you can create a list for each person in order to see who is overworked and distribute the work within the team.

I feel there are fewer linked services than other tools. It would be convenient to be notified by external email or chat when a task is added, or the status is updated. Alternatively, such a linking tool may already exist. Still, there are few users compared to other tools, and even if you search for a manual as the optimal customization method, you may not be able to find it.

I like the different views: Gantt, table, list, calendar, dashboard, etc. This is my favorite thing about Wrike because not everyone thinks the same way. And bi-locating. And custom fields - it's really elevated my reporting. And blueprints - TIME SAVER.

Limitations around sorting - in marketing we NEED to sort by due date, not start date, because our work pivots constantly. Limitations on forms - I really wish I could make a form with logic. Limitations with automation - it's such a cool feature that you can automate pretty much everything but I haven't had great success when rolling out to the team.

Thanks to the platform's flexibility, I've been able to centralize and simplify a great deal of my work. The most exciting feature is the seamless real-time communication and team overview that it provides. In sum, if you're wanting to increase productivity and better manage your workload, Wrike is a tool I'd strongly suggest.

If I had to select one thing, it would be that all the features and options may seem overwhelming at first. It took me some time to learn how to maximize the effectiveness of each feature.

Wrike is an effective web-based project management and resource planning platform, which has enough features to be useful, but also enough flexibility and customization—on both the enterprise and user-level—to work for a variety of organizations, individuals, and work-styles. The project management view is particularly helpful as the same project can be viewed as a list, (kanban) board, table (spreadsheet view), Gantt chart and more. This allows users flexibility to engage with projects in the way that works for them.

The calendar functionality and design could be more elegant, as it feels like a somewhat neglected corner of the platform. It is functional, but not pretty.