--- description: Avaliações detalhadas do Nfield com base nos recursos, preços, facilidade de utilização e classificações. Veja rapidamente as vantagens e desvantagens. Compare o Nfield com produtos similares. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Nfield - Avaliações, preços e classificações | GetApp Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Ferramentas de Pesquisa](/directory/234/survey/software) > [Nfield](/software/114193/nfield) # Nfield Canonical: https://www.getapp.com.br/software/114193/nfield Página: 1 / 2\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/114193/nfield?page=2) > O Nfield é uma plataforma de coleta de dados on-line, CAPI e CATI para profissionais de pesquisa de mercado conduzirem pesquisas seguras, de alta qualidade e profissionais. As organizações podem apresentar perguntas usando modelos atraentes que respondem totalmente a dispositivos com diferentes tamanhos de tela. > > Conclusão: 18 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.4/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.4/5** | 18 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.1/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.2/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 3.9/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.2/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: NIPO - **Localização**: Amsterdam, Países Baixos - **Fundada**: 1979 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 2.000,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Chromebook (desktop), Android (celular) - **Idiomas**: alemão, chinês, chinês tradicional, coreano, dinamarquês, espanhol, finlandês, francês, hebraico, holandês, húngaro, indonésio, inglês, irlandês, italiano, japonês, norueguês, polonês, português, russo, sueco, tailandês, tcheco, turco, ucraniano, árabe - **Países disponíveis**: Afeganistão, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Armênia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Barein, Belize, Benin e mais 210 ## Recursos - API - Acesso offline - Acompanhamento de atividades - Alertas/notificações - Análise de dados visual - Análise de tendências - Análise estatística - Apto para áudio, imagens e vídeo - Arrastar e soltar - Benchmarking - Biblioteca de perguntas - Campos personalizáveis - Coleta de respostas offline - Controles/permissões de acesso - Cotas de respostas - Criador de questionários - Criação de diagramas - Distribuição de multicanal - Email Reminders - Face a face ## Integrações (2 no total) - IBM SPSS Statistics - Microsoft Power BI ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Ferramentas de Pesquisa](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/234/survey/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Ferramentas de Pesquisa](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/234/survey/software) - [Ferramentas de Pesquisa de Mercado](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/889/market-research/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Typeform](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/91581/typeform) — 4.7/5 (964 reviews) 2. [Google Forms](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/112857/google-forms) — 4.7/5 (11432 reviews) 3. [SurveyMonkey](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/2371/surveymonkey) — 4.6/5 (10455 reviews) 4. [Jotform](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/10191/jotform-4-0) — 4.7/5 (2885 reviews) 5. [QuestionPro](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/103311/questionpro) — 4.8/5 (529 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Survey Platform for all Methodologies" — 5.0/5 > **Chakrapani** | *2 de julho de 2020* | Pesquisa de mercado | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Nfield is the only software I have worked so far that covers all methodologies CAPI, Online and CATI. NIPO improved it software along with time. Nfield adopts Azure Cloud based (data collection) systems which have high standards of security in terms of data. Data can be exported in various formats for further analysis. Nfield has responsive templates that are easy to program and very interactive for the respondent. They keep adding more solutions to their kit. NIPO provides trainings along with purchase of product for the new customers. For the existing customers, they provide regular trainings/refreshers through Academies which is unique for Nfield. NIPO has a good team of developers and support system to for new product development. > > **Desvantagens**: Data export into excel from Nfield would help to quickly analyze data. Improvements in Reporting tool required. > > Perfect platform for CAPI and CAWI studies, Nfield is a good solution for projects with mixed methology. With introduction of interactive / responsive solutions and layouts, there is great acceptance of Nfield along teams. ----- ### "Nfield: a reasonable toolkit for data collection" — 5.0/5 > **Bence** | *12 de setembro de 2018* | Pesquisa de mercado | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Nipo provides a good all-in-one package. Relatively easy to create a stunning, responsive survey for online studies and manage that on a clear, easy-to-use UI. Regarding offline studies, based on my experience Nfield CAPI platform is market leader. The programming of the online or offline script is almost identical, there are no limitations. From developers point of view we can use the same custom solutions like templates, question controls or more complex solutions like read values from a json database both online and offline too. Finally, there is an API, which allows to extend Nfield with extra functionalities. > > **Desvantagens**: It has a unique descriptive scripting language, which requires a different way of thinking to fulfill very complex survey situations comparing by other, more general programming languages. The data storing requires extra attention once the survey structure changed during fieldwork, which is not ideal, but happens sometimes. ----- ### "KGDC PH Nfield software review" — 3.0/5 > **Jose Martin** | *12 de setembro de 2018* | Pesquisa de mercado | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Syntax wise, platform is easy to use/script. Given that platform runs on Android based devices, our company doesn't need that much budget on device allocation compared to others which require Windows based devices. > > **Desvantagens**: Templates tend to be different to each other making user's adjustment difficult. Limited function offerings in line with our business. No control on database. > > Given that we work on a Market research agency, Nfield greatly helps the business. Nfield is the main platform we use for data collection as of the moment and I believe our mandate moving forward is to move all projects to this plaform. ----- ### "It must be NField" — 5.0/5 > **Kalina** | *30 de junho de 2020* | Pesquisa | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The product is very easy to use. We use it to collect both offline and online data. Even older interviewers that made offline interviews using tablets use it with the ease of programmers. The questions can be visualized according to the wishes of our clients. For over 10 years of experience with Nipo Odin Scripting I have not had a case of unfulfilled wishes of our clients. Created survey is understandable to the user - this is the most important point when you collect data. NField follows the processes in our organization so the integration was very easy - the only thing we had to do is to create credentials for users. And of couse the most useful part for monitoring the field work and tracking the consistency of the collected answers. And you can do it from where you want - PC, laptop, tablet, smartphone... , where you are - at office or at home, and when you want. > > **Desvantagens**: The only thing that can be improved is to create more roles in the system. For example if my role in the company is to monitor the fieldwork, there is no need to have access to the questionnaire. ----- ### "Review" — 4.0/5 > **Mehdi** | *15 de maio de 2020* | Pesquisa de mercado | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: It is an evolving software and the the infrastructure is very reliable. > > **Desvantagens**: Now that the foundations are secured, it would be of additional value to have more templates and question designs (especially for mobile studies) is to me the key area to improve. also for API endpoints, it would be of great help if there was a kind of wizard to better support in the integration (it just asks for the required information to establish the connection and takes care of the rest) - eg. being an early adopter/tester of the database reporting feature, I see it as a powerful inspiration... In a longer term, I see that there are many steps to go through: loading the script, loading media files, setting quotas, assigning/loading sample file, downloading data package, generating var/prn/sps and then running the syntax...It would be great if we can smoother the process > > Mostly collecting survey data offline and online Recently I am using it to report data in real time in Tableau, before that (and with my limited knowledge), I used it to collect profiling data (panel profiling) and punch it in a google form through exitlink to filter and report in Tableau (Google sheets webconnector) ----- Página: 1 / 2\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/114193/nfield?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em GetApp](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/114193/nfield) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dados estruturados