--- description: Avaliações detalhadas do Load Balancer Enterprise ADC com base nos recursos, preços, facilidade de utilização e classificações. Veja rapidamente as vantagens e desvantagens. Compare o Load Balancer Enterprise ADC com produtos similares. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Load Balancer Enterprise ADC - Avaliações, preços e classificações | GetApp Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software para Balanceamento de Carga](/directory/478/load-balancer/software) > [Load Balancer Enterprise ADC](/software/118583/loadbalancer-org) # Load Balancer Enterprise ADC Canonical: https://www.getapp.com.br/software/118583/loadbalancer-org Página: 1 / 4\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/118583/loadbalancer-org?page=2) > O Loadbalancer.org é uma solução baseada na nuvem para gestão de TI que ajuda pequenas e grandes empresas a projetar e manter a entrega de aplicativos. A plataforma habilita empresas a gerenciar a largura de banda da rede, SSL, firewalls de aplicativos, balanceamento global de cargas do servidor e servidores virtuais/reais. > > Conclusão: 64 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.8/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.8/5** | 64 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.5/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.9/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.8/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.6/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Loadbalancer.org - **Localização**: Wilmington, DE, EUA - **Fundada**: 2003 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 95,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: Profissional autônomo, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Chromebook (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Países disponíveis**: Afeganistão, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Armênia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Barein, Belize, Benin e mais 210 ## Recursos - API - Acompanhamento da saúde - Agendadores - Alertas/notificações - Análise de dados visual - Armazenamento de conteúdo no cache - Armazenamento de dados seguros - Autenticação - Backup e recuperação - Compressão - Conferir redundâncias - Configuração automática - Controle de tráfego - Controle e acesso remoto - Controles/permissões de acesso - Desobrigação de SSL - Encaminhamento de conteúdo - Gerenciamento de configuração - Gerenciamento de usuários - Gestão de múltiplas nuvens ## Integrações (1 no total) - Microsoft Azure ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Suporte por telefone - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software para Balanceamento de Carga](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/478/load-balancer/software) ## Alternativas 1. [ManageEngine OpManager](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/90387/manageengine-opmanager) — 4.5/5 (274 reviews) 2. [Atera](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/102017/atera) — 4.5/5 (448 reviews) 3. [Radware Alteon](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/2076928/alteon-va) — 4.9/5 (8 reviews) 4. [Action1](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/2048001/action1-rmm) — 4.9/5 (237 reviews) 5. [NinjaOne](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/108129/ninjarmm) — 4.7/5 (288 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "The WAF that can save your network" — 5.0/5 > **Roger** | *27 de abril de 2022* | Telecomunicações | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The control it gives us to block unauthorized access into our network. The WAF rules are easy to create and the included firewall and per WAF blocking rules are terrific. > > **Desvantagens**: Loadbalancer.org does not do proper WAF integration with all pieces of a Metaswitch Enhanced Application Server. As an end user we have to constantly write new rules to make the device work properly. > > A very positive experience once we got the WAF to work properly. Our internal telephony network has never run this clean since installing the Loadbalancer.org WAF. ----- ### "Support is everything..." — 5.0/5 > **Eder** | *14 de fevereiro de 2025* | Administração pública | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I like it's simplicity and the support. I worked with NetScaler for a good majority of my career and switching for loadbalancer.org has been the best decision for my organization. The support is always fast and good. > > **Desvantagens**: I honestly can't think of a cons at the moment; maybe just improve abilities to do more with ACL rules, like for instance create the ability to block by source domain; rather than just IP. > > My overall experience has been positive, I'm impressed with the product as a replacement for Netscaler load balancers. It costs much less, the support is much better, and it has done it's job almost perfectly. ----- ### "We purchased it from web and in notime with the help of support it was up and running" — 4.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *17 de abril de 2018* | Bancos | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Based on Linux platform, it is robust and secure. And provide unlimited customization levels. You can actually request something to suit your organizational needs. You can run multiple services not limited to operating system e.g. you can run to loadbalance Windows Server Farm and Web applications simultaneously. you can introduce new servers in existing setup and take out old without any downtime > > **Desvantagens**: Web UI to configure is bit complex , However the support is excellent and provide service promptly. Agent less there is not much information you can what going on target services > > We are running dual server farm for end user computing and financial application. We were using 2x LoadBalancer as most of our users connect to windows servers from linux platform. Initially we started using this for Windows Terminal Servers and then we tweaked it bit further added other services available locally. Since it works on TCP services we were able to add multiple services in single platform. The comparing product was 10 times more expensive and providing very similar features. We found loadbalancer quite effective in terms of both cost and functionality. ----- ### "Fujifilm Synapse PACS and Load Balancer Enterprise ADC" — 5.0/5 > **Lutz** | *21 de agosto de 2024* | Hospitais e Saúde | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: We have been using Load Balancer Enterprise ADC in medical IT for several years. Reliability, stability and load balancing are important points in a modern IT infrastructure. Load Balancer Enterprise ADC was easy to implement. The support responds quickly and competently. I can highly recommend the product. > > **Desvantagens**: I haven't seen any disadvantages so far. > > To summarize, I can say that we are very satisfied with the product. Sales and support respond quickly. Inquiries are dealt with quickly and competently. The product is stable and requires little work. ----- ### "Great product\!" — 5.0/5 > **Nikos** | *23 de outubro de 2025* | Filantropia | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: It is value for money and the GUI is easy to navigate. The GUI is very easy to learn and documentation is comprehensible. > > **Desvantagens**: Some aspects rely on the underlying OS to function. You still need basic linux knowledge to work on some features. ----- Página: 1 / 4\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/118583/loadbalancer-org?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em GetApp](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/118583/loadbalancer-org) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dados estruturados