--- description: Avaliações detalhadas do BrowserStack com base nos recursos, preços, facilidade de utilização e classificações. Veja rapidamente as vantagens e desvantagens. Compare o BrowserStack com produtos similares. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack - Avaliações, preços e classificações | GetApp Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Testes de Carga](/directory/1959/load-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.com.br/software/170655/browserstack Página: 1 / 32\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > O BrowserStack é uma plataforma de teste entre navegadores que permite aos desenvolvedores integrar ferramentas para realizar testes automatizados, visuais e ao vivo em aplicativos e sites móveis. As equipes de DevOps também podem realizar testes locais em aplicativos de trabalho em andamento (WIP, na sigla em inglês) sem hospedá-los em ambientes públicos. > > Conclusão: 776 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.6/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.6/5** | 776 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.6/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.2/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.5/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: BrowserStack - **Fundada**: 2011 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 39,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Versão gratuita disponível) (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: Profissional autônomo, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Países disponíveis**: Alemanha, Austrália, Brasil, Canadá, Dinamarca, Emirados Árabes Unidos, Estados Unidos, Ilhas Virgens Americanas, Ilhas Virgens Britânicas, Irlanda, Israel, México, Reino Unido, Singapura, África do Sul, Índia ## Recursos - A/B Testing - API - Acompanhamento de atividades - Agendamento - Alertas/notificações - Análise da causa raiz - Análise da produtividade - Análise de dados do site - Análise de dados preditiva - Análise de dados visual - Análise de tendências - Análise estática - Armazenamento de dados seguros - Arrastar e soltar - Automated Testing - Avaliações de roteiros de teste - Benchmarking - Campos personalizáveis - Captura de tela - Cenários de carga ## Integrações (74 no total) - APS Payroll - AWS Cloud9 - AWS Lambda - Android Studio - Appium - Asana - Atlas - Azure DevOps Labs - Azure DevOps Server - Azure DevTest Labs - Azure Pipelines - Azure SQL Database - Birdeye - Birdseye - BitBrowser ... e mais 59 integrações ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software de Testes de Carga](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/1959/load-testing/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Software de Testes de Carga](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [Ferramentas de Gerenciamento de Testes](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](https://www.getapp.com.br/directory/389/testing/software) ## Alternativas 1. [WebLOAD](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/1999307/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) 2. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 3. [Userlytics](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/121415/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 4. [Hotjar](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/101789/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (545 reviews) 5. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/113797/testim) — 4.6/5 (50 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Good tool for cross browser testing with real devices" — 4.0/5 > **Logesh** | *3 de abril de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The best part about BrowserStack is that you can access real devices and various browser versions without needing to maintain any physical setup. This makes it easier to test across different environments quickly. The UI is simple and easy to navigate. The live testing feature is useful for quick validations and debugging. > > **Desvantagens**: Sometimes the sessions feel slow or laggy, especially when switching between devices. The pricing can also be a bit high for smaller teams or individual users. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been positive. As a QA engineer, I mainly use it for cross-browser and responsive testing. It saves a lot of time compared to setting up local environments or using actual devices. I have used it to test UI issues and browser compatibility across various platforms. While there is some room for improvement in its performance, it remains a reliable tool for my daily testing needs. ----- ### "Everything under a single umbrella\!" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *7 de abril de 2026* | Serviços financeiros | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: it offers a variety of features from mobile devices to test, manage reports and integration with tools like jira and CI/CD pipelines > > **Desvantagens**: Connectivity issues while performing Device testing. This is not all the time, however, i do face this issue from time to time. > > Overall a great SaaS application which makes life easy since it offers all major featureslike tools to ttest, report and integration with other apps. All in one\! ----- ### "Focus on Future Nitche" — 3.0/5 > **Acharaj** | *1 de abril de 2026* | Serviços de informação | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Its Test Bed capacities Its Evaluation Matrix Improvisation (which is not live yet) All in one solution > > **Desvantagens**: Self Healing Feature is still not up to the mark Prompt Design Engg \& Self Feedback Looping- You should be focusing on this more. This is the backbone of AI generated tests. Less competitive as compare to their nitche players > > Good, but i think product should be taking a deep review of the other good players in market like TestIM, Promptfoo.com for different features. From there they can get some references \& get good features implemented. ----- ### "Reliable cross-browser testing platform with a few rough edges" — 5.0/5 > **Poojan** | *15 de maio de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The biggest win is access to real device and browsers without setting up anything locally. I can quickly test our web app on actual iPhone, Android phones, and different browsers version whenever needed. Ease of use is solid - the dashboard is clean and getting started takes just a few minutes. For automation, integrating Selenium scripts is simple; I just update the hub URL and my existing tests run on their cloud. The debugging features like video recordings, console logs, and screenshots make it much easier to share big reports with developers. Customer support has also been responsive whenever I have raised tickets, usually getting back within a few hours. > > **Desvantagens**: Value for money is where it falls short. The pricing jumps quickly when you need more parallel sessions or want to add team members, which can be hard to justify for smaller teams. Test sessions sometimes feel slower than local execution, especially on mobile devices during peak hours. Test management features are basic compared to dedicated tools, so we still rely on other platforms for tracking test cases and results. > > Overall, it's been a practical tool that solves a real problem - testing across multiple browsers and device without maintaining a physical lab. For day-to-day testing and automation across different environments, it does the job well and saves a lot of setup time. The platform is stable most of the time, and the variety of devices and browsers is impressive. The main trade-off is the cost, which keeps adding up as your needs grow. If you treat it purely as a cross-browser and device testing tool rather than a complete QA solution, it delivers good value. We have integrated it into our regular release cycles, and it has definitely helped us catch issues earlier across different environments. ----- ### "Def worth the money, some things could be better\!" — 4.0/5 > **Oleksiy** | *23 de março de 2026* | Publicidade e marketing | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I use BrowserStack to test sites, HTML5 creatives, and other things related to HTML behavior on devices. I like that there are so many different devices to choose from, as well as a variety of browsers and browser versions available. It's super helpful and all of that works well with VPN too. The initial account setup was very easy, and we had an account manager to assist us. > > **Desvantagens**: The network console is often buggy and does not capture network events sometimes. The console would also oftentimes get disconnected, which means that you have to re-start the device. > > Overall, the experience is rather positive and the tool is very helpful especially for mobile tests. It helps to bypass bot-traffic blocks, providing a reliable testing environment compared to emulators. ----- Página: 1 / 32\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em GetApp](https://www.getapp.com.br/software/170655/browserstack) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dados estruturados